Übersetzung im Kontext von „interceptor“ in Englisch-Deutsch von Reverso Context: Under many aspects, Grumman F Tomcat is undoubtedly the best. Übersetzung Englisch-Deutsch für interceptor im PONS Online-Wörterbuch nachschlagen! Gratis Vokabeltrainer, Verbtabellen, Aussprachefunktion. Con la introducción de cinco modelos nuevos de dispositivos Steelhead (los modelos , , , y ) y el nuevo Riverbed Interceptor
Interceptor Deutsch "interceptor" Deutsch Übersetzung
Lernen Sie die Übersetzung für 'interceptor' in LEOs Englisch ⇔ Deutsch Wörterbuch. Mit Flexionstabellen der verschiedenen Fälle und Zeiten ✓ Aussprache. Übersetzung für 'interceptor' im kostenlosen Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch von LANGENSCHEIDT – mit Beispielen, Synonymen und Aussprache. Übersetzung Englisch-Deutsch für interceptor im PONS Online-Wörterbuch nachschlagen! Gratis Vokabeltrainer, Verbtabellen, Aussprachefunktion. Englisch-Deutsch-Übersetzungen für interceptor im Online-Wörterbuch biuro-nieruchomosci.eu (Deutschwörterbuch). Übersetzung im Kontext von „interceptor“ in Englisch-Deutsch von Reverso Context: Under many aspects, Grumman F Tomcat is undoubtedly the best. Übersetzung im Kontext von „interceptor is“ in Englisch-Deutsch von Reverso Context: The interceptor is closing on the Skrreean ship. Übersetzung für 'interceptor' im kostenlosen Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch und viele weitere Deutsch-Übersetzungen.
Englisch-Deutsch-Übersetzungen für interceptor im Online-Wörterbuch biuro-nieruchomosci.eu (Deutschwörterbuch). Übersetzung für "interceptor" im Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch dictindustry - mit Forum und Beispielen. Übersetzung für 'interceptor' im kostenlosen Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch von LANGENSCHEIDT – mit Beispielen, Synonymen und Aussprache.
Interceptor Deutsch Looks promising VideoJay Leno's Garage: Full Opening - Charlie Sheen Rides Shotgun With Jay - CNBC Prime
Now, in Interceptor, they return from the Universe, with fresh and more powerful forces. Of course, your mission is to stop their evil plans and rescue the humanity.
Unlike its prequels, this game focuses especially on the resources management and on space combat simulation, but the strategy elements also dominate the style.
After the Earth was out of resources, the humans decided to look for them in the space. You play as the commander of a region in the space called The Frontier, that is full of resources.
As in the previous games, you can build numerous structures with certain and special destinations. But this is possible only if your budget is high enough.
Another aspect that wasn't encountered in the previous versions is the different attacking strategy adopted by your enemies, the aliens.
In the early Cold War era the combination of jet -powered bombers and nuclear weapons created air force demand for highly capable interceptors; it is during this period that the term is perhaps most recognized and used.
Through the s and s, the rapid improvements in design led to most air-superiority and multirole fighters , such as the Grumman F Tomcat and McDonnell Douglas F Eagle , having the performance to take on the point defense interception role, and the strategic threat moved from bombers to intercontinental ballistic missiles ICBMs.
The first interceptor squadrons were formed during World War I to defend London against attacks by Zeppelins and later against fixed-wing long-range bombers.
Early units generally used aircraft withdrawn from front-line service, notably the Sopwith Pup. They were told about their target's location before take-off from a command centre in the Horse Guards building.
The Pup proved to have too low performance to easily intercept Gotha G. IV bombers, and the superior Sopwith Camels supplanted them.
The term "interceptor" was in use by Visual and acoustic detection from the ground had a range of only a few miles, which meant that an interceptor would have insufficient time to climb to altitude before the bombers reached their targets.
Standing combat air patrols were possible but only at great cost. The conclusion at the time was that " the bomber will always get through ".
Ground controlled interception required constant contact between the interceptor and the ground until the bombers became visible to the pilots and nationwide networks like the Dowding system were built in the late s to coordinate these efforts.
Although radars also improved in performance, the gap between offense and defense was dramatically reduced. Large attacks could so confuse the defense's ability to communicate with pilots that the classic method of manual ground controlled interception was increasingly seen as inadequate.
In the United States, this led to the introduction of the Semi-Automatic Ground Environment to computerize this task, while in the UK it led to enormously powerful radars to improve detection time.
The introduction of the first useful surface-to-air missiles in the s obviated the need for fast reaction time interceptors as the missile could launch almost instantly.
Air forces increasingly turned to much larger interceptor designs, with enough fuel for longer endurance, leaving the point-defense role to the missiles.
This led to the abandonment of a number of short-range designs like the Avro Arrow and Convair F in favor of much larger and longed-ranged designs like the North American F and MiG In the s, during the Cold War , a strong interceptor force was crucial for the great powers as the best means to defend against an unexpected nuclear attack by strategic bombers.
Hence, for a brief period of time they faced rapid development. The doctrine of mutually assured destruction replaced the trend of defense strengthening, making interceptors less strategically logical.
The utility of interceptors waned as the role merged with that of the heavy air superiority fighter , which was dominant in military thinking.
The interceptor mission is, by its nature, a difficult one. Consider the desire to protect a single target from attack by long-range bombers.
The bombers have the advantage of being able to select the parameters of the mission — attack vector, speed and altitude. This results in an enormous area from which the attack can originate.
In the time it takes for the bombers to cross the distance from first detection to being on their targets, the interceptor must be able to start, take off, climb to altitude, maneuver for attack and then attack the bomber.
A dedicated interceptor aircraft sacrifices the capabilities of the air superiority fighter and multirole fighter i.
The result is that interceptors often look very impressive on paper, typically outrunning, outclimbing and outgunning slower fighter designs. However, pure interceptors fare poorly in fighter-to-fighter combat against the same "less capable" designs due to limited maneuverability especially at low altitudes.
In the spectrum of various interceptors, one design approach especially shows sacrifices necessary to achieve decisive benefit in a chosen aspect of performance.
A "point defense interceptor" is  of a lightweight design, intended to spend most of its time on the ground located at the defended target, and able to launch on demand, climb to altitude, manoeuvre and then attack the bomber in a very short time, before the bomber can deploy its weapons.
At the end of Second World War, the Luftwaffe ' s most critical requirement was for interceptors as the Commonwealth and American air forces pounded German targets night and day.
As the bombing effort grew, notably in early , the Luftwaffe introduced a rocket-powered design, the Messerschmitt Me Komet , in the very-short-range interceptor role.
The engine allowed about 7 minutes of powered flight, but offered such tremendous performance that they could fly right by the defending fighters.
Following the Emergency Fighter Program , the Germans developed even odder designs, such as the Bachem Ba Natter , which launched vertically and thus eliminated the need for an airbase.
In general all these initial German designs proved difficult to operate, often becoming death traps for their pilots,  and had little effect on the bombing raids.
In the initial stage of Cold War , bombers were expected to attack flying higher and faster, even at transonic speeds. Initial transonic and supersonic fighters had modest internal fuel tanks in their slim fuselages, but a very high fuel consumption.
This led fighter prototypes emphasizing acceleration and operational ceiling, with a sacrifice on the loiter time, essentially limiting them to point defense role.
The Soviet and Western trials with zero-length launch were also related. None of these found practical use. Designs that depended solely on jet engines achieved more success with the F Starfighter initial A version and the English Electric Lightning.
The role of manned point defense designs was reassigned to unmanned interceptors— surface-to-air missiles SAMs —which first reached an adequate level in — By flying terrain masking low-altitude nap-of-the-earth flight profiles the effective range, and therefore reaction time, of ground-based radar was limited to at best the radar horizon.
In the case of ground radar systems this can be countered by placing radar systems on mountain tops to extend the radar horizon, or through placing high performance radars in interceptors or in AWACs aircraft used to direct point defense interceptors.
As capabilities continued to improve — especially through the widespread introduction of the jet engine and the adoption of high speed, low level flight profiles, the time available between detection and interception dropped.
Most advanced point defence interceptors combined with long-range radars were struggling to keep the reaction time down enough to be effective.
Fixed times, like the time needed for the pilot to climb into the cockpit, became an increasing portion of the overall mission time, there were few ways to reduce this.
During the Cold War in times of heightened tensions, quick reaction alert QRA aircraft were kept piloted, fully fuelled and armed, with the engines running at idle on the runway ready to take off.
The aircraft being kept topped up with fuel via hoses from underground fuel tanks. If a possible intruder was identified, the aircraft would be ready to take off as soon as the external fuel lines were detached.
However, keeping QRA aircraft at this state of readiness was physically and mentally draining to the pilots and was expensive in terms of fuel.
As an alternative, longer-range designs with extended loiter times were considered. These area defense interceptors or area defense fighters were in general larger designs intended to stay on lengthy patrol and protect a much larger area from attack, depending on greater detection capabilities, both in the aircraft themselves and operating with AWACS, rather than high speed to reach targets.
The exemplar of this concept was the Tupolev Tu The later Panavia Tornado ADV was able to achieve long range in a smaller airframe through the use of more efficient engines.
High speed and acceleration was put into long-range and medium-range AAMs, and agility into short range dog fighting AAMs, rather than into the aircraft themselves.
They were first to introduce all-weather avionics , assuring successful operations during night, rain, snow, or fog.
Countries that were strategically dependent on surface fleet, most notably US and UK, maintained also fleet defense fighters , such as the F Tomcat.
During the Cold War , an entire military service, not just an arm of the pre-existing air force, was designated for deployment of interceptors.